Best counting system for 6 deck blackjack
Jun 24, · Best count system for 2 deck, 4 deck, 6 deck, 8 deck? If this is your first visit to the Blackjack Forum, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You will have to r e g i s t e r Using full indexes, Hi-Opt II is clearly the best among the other 3 counting systems. Sep 22, · hello everybody!!what is the best counting system for single or double deck blackjack? i usually play a six deck shoe game and using Hi-Lo count because of its MATMM.ME far it works for me. the rules for double decks -dealer hits on soft 17,double after a split and on any two cards,no. Learn how to read a blackjack strategy chart and find examples of a 6 deck black jack strategy charts to use while playing online blackjack games.
The Best Card Counting System
I was unable to find the reference in print but the technique has been used by some Red Seven and Halves players for many years. You can find a link to information on the Hi-Lo Lite at the upper left of this page, with complete information in Blackbelt in Blackjack. These systems represent the upper limit of single parameter systems which score high in both playing efficiency and betting correlation. John Gwynn Jr. My method is a simplification of Peter Griffin's method in Theory of Blackjack, and for all practical purposes, is just as accurate.
How to Compare Blackjack Card Counting Systems
If you're new to card counting, and are looking for your first card-counting system, I recommend you start with our Intro to Winning Blackjack article. There are links in that article to several card counting systems, from the easiest system I've ever seen to a full professional-level system, as well as information for new card counters on how to choose the best system for you. A number of blackjack players have written me asking my opinion of the "best" card counting system.
This is a loaded question. Complete information about both counts is provided in Blackbelt in Blackjack ]. If you are using a card counting system with which you are comfortable, and you feel you can play it accurately, then stick with it. There is more money to be made by finding and exploiting lucrative table conditions than by "upgrading" your card counting strategy.
Your "act" is more important than any amount of complex mental arithmetic you do at the tables. Card counting is automatic and boring once you know your system. This is as it should be, so that you may apply your efforts to the more important work of pretending to be a non-card-counter; engaging dealers and pit-bosses in conversation; flirting with cocktail waitresses; acting engrossed in the Keno board, etc. A "multi-parameter count," on the other hand, is one that keeps separate running counts for various cards.
I am of the opinion that the most difficult higher level single parameter card counting system i. Most card counters, including serious professionals, should stick with level one single-parameter card counting systems.
It addresses how system sellers sometimes fudge results to make their systems look better. For more information on card counting and blackjack basic strategy, and instructions for the Red 7 card counting system, see the end of this article. It will also discuss important issues in the comparison of different blackjack card counting systems. In order to accomplish this in the sim, unrealistic bets are forced. I can already see a barrage of letters from players asking me to explain why anyone would want an analysis based on such an impractical, nay impossible, betting methodology.
Briefly, the purpose of this type of analysis is not to tell us our win rate to the exact penny per hour, nor is it to suggest that we should attempt to mimic the impractical betting strategies in the real world so that we may obtain optimal results. Let me provide one practical example. It is not difficult for me to set up a computer simulation where the Hi-Lo Count will outperform the Advanced Omega II a much stronger and more difficult count , even when both counts are being played accurately and employing the same betting spread.
All I have to do is play around with the betting strategies so that Omega II is waiting too long to put its big bets on the table.
If I simply raise the true count by one or two numbers where these bigger bets are placed, then Hi-Lo will appear to be a stronger system. But in fact, the Hi-Lo is simply being played more aggressively and with a higher risk of ruin. I first learned about this aggression factor back in the early s, when I was working with Dr. John Gwynn, Jr. In order to compare different count systems using the same betting spread in the same game, I asked Gwynn to produce data showing the full range of possible betting schemes for each system based on the various true counts.
The data Gwynn and I came up with showed nothing about risk of ruin, but it did show that a player who wanted to optimize his percent advantage over the house could do so by raising his bets at precisely the right counts.
If you play blackjack for an hour or two, your results will be pretty unpredictable. You may win a lot, or you may lose a lot. However, if you average out your results over many hours, it becomes clear that playing smarter will save you a lot of money. That may not sound like much, but it is four times as expensive as it need be. A basic strategy player in a typical 6-deck game loses approximately 0.
Playing a 2-deck game instead cuts the house edge to about 0. A player using the correct basic strategy will lose 0. What makes up this difference? What follows is a list of the most common errors I see made by blackjack players. Lots of players hate to hit 12 here, especially in the third-base seat. The casinos love to hear that. So, hitting is better by 24 cents. Most players misplay this hand.
They figure, why hit an 18? Eighteen is a poor hand. But it comes at a price. This is just like 12 vs 3, with the same silly excuses. But now, the numbers are even more convincing…. This is a popular one. Many players hate to put more money on the table in a losing situation. Sound reasonable, right? Well, sometimes not. This is another mistake that most players make. Hit it. I guess some people just want to play for a push here.
You can actually turn a losing situation into a winning one on average by hitting this hand. Just hit it. But, I do see it occasionally. Some misguided players think this makes it a bad play. If it bothers you, just think of it as doubling down on two elevens instead. And, consider what starting with a hand of 2 or 12 is likely to produce. This one is a real no-brainer.
Ante up and split. Every time. The floor space would be converted to slot machines in a flash. Details for the obsessive: The dollar amounts calculated in this article assume a 6-deck S17 DAS game. Player hand of 12 is assumed to be Ten,2. Player hand of 11 is assumed to be 5,6. Other compositions yield very slightly different amounts.